
The Chief Executive Officers (CEO) of America’s leading Detroit-based automakers including Richard Wagoner of General Motors, Alan Mulally of Ford Motor Company, and Tom LaSorda of Chrysler Group has recently conducted a meeting with President George W. Bush to help improve the development of alternative fuel (e.g. ethanol and biodiesel fuel). The three automakers also aim to reduce the country’s dependence on petroleum based products and reduce consumption of gas.
After the meeting with President Bush, the three CEOs went outside the White House with the President and US Transportation Secretary Mary Peters to discuss some ways on how to improve the consumer’s access to alternative fuels.
Here is what the three CEOs said in a join statement regarding the meeting:
“We briefed the President about the more than 6 million FFVs on the road today and we will add over a million FFV cars and trucks in 2007 alone. We explained to the President that if all these vehicles were running on E85, they would displace more than 3.6 billion gallons of gasoline a year. And even more compelling, if all the E85 capable vehicles on the road today — along with those that GM, Ford and DaimlerChrysler have already committed to produce over the next 10 years — were to run on E85, we could displace 22 billion gallons of gasoline annually. Also, if all manufacturers made a comparable commitment to make half their annual production capable of running on biofuels, we could increase the savings to 37 billion gallons of gasoline annually in 2017.
Furthermore, we pointed out the benefits of clean diesel technology and that if all diesel vehicles today were fueled with B5 (five percent biodiesel) we could displace 1.85 billion gallons of petroleum per year; and 7.4 billion gallons per year if B20 (20 percent biodiesel) were utilized.
In order to achieve these levels of petroleum savings, we asked the President to help provide Americans with reasonable access to these fuels at a price that is competitive with gasoline. Right now there are approximately 1,100 E85 pumps in the U.S. and 1,000 biodiesel pumps, out of 170,000 gas stations. We expressed to the President that we are willing to lead the way, but we need government and fuel providers to increase infrastructure before we can make a meaningful impact.
In addition, we discussed with the President that as part of an overall national strategy to fully tap the potential of biofuels to displace petroleum, vehicle production increases must be accompanied by continuing the incentives that encourage the manufacture, distribution, and availability of biofuels and the production of flexible fuel vehicles.
We updated the President on our wide range of advanced vehicle technologies that run on alternative fuels such as E85, biodiesel, electricity and hydrogen. Plug-in hybrid vehicles can play a significant role in our transportation future. Increased funding for domestic battery research and development can help accelerate bringing these vehicles to market.
Overall, we were pleased with the exchange that we had with the President and all parties came away with an understanding of the significant, positive impact that biofuels can make on the environment and in reducing our nation’s reliance on oil.
We welcome the opportunity to continue working with President Bush, his Administration, and the Congress in a bipartisan manner and to move forward on solutions to these issues while continuing to do our part to ensure America’s long-standing leadership in manufacturing and innovation.”
This statement emphasizes that GM, Ford, and DaimlerChrysler will develop and produce vehicles with E85 capability in the next 10 years. So expect to see a Mercedes-Benz luxury super car model running on ethanol fuel pumping out on its Mercedes engine parts.
22 users commented in " Joint Statement of Ford, Gm, Chrysler on Meeting With Pres. Bush "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackNice job with the video SPE. Well done. Very educational.
I need to know the steps of Petroleum Exploration to Production in Details…
Something like the following :
Step 1 : Geology : Magnetic Survey’s , Mapping .. etc
Step 2 : Geophysicst: Siesmic Survey’s..etc
Step 3 : ?
Someone Please help me out
I just need Keywords and ill do the research on each item listed … all help would be appriciated.
Thanks in Advance!
I have a degree in mechanical engineering and I worked for a major oil company for 35 years. They paid me just as well as they did the petroleum engineers. In fact I was so well paid that I retired before I was 60 years old. I also had a really interesting, challenging and rewarding career.
It really isn't the degree you have that determines your success but doing what you enjoy and how you apply yourself to the opportunities you have.
No… not unless you meet the requirements of the new degree program.. It may take an extra year of schooling – maybe more.
You need to check with the Petroleum Engineering department to see what the requirements are – THEN you must look at the course offerings and see if you can take the necessary courses in a reasonable time.
It may take two years to accomplish.
Texas Tech has an excellent PE school as well as a great Petroleum Geology program….one of our professors pretty much wrote the book on well logs…hes world renown…his name is Dr.George Asquith.
Yes you can specialize in petroleum with a chem eng degree. Some schools also have petroleum engineering course.
It won't be replaced soon, don't worry.
But even if it was replaced by next year by some unknown fuel source, petroleum is still used in giant quantities to make rubber, plastics, detergents, fertilizer and endless other chemicals.
I don't know what you would call a "top engineering school" but there are certainly a lot of chemical engineers working for oil companies in the area that a petroleum engineer would normally work.
Many don't come from the "top schools" but rather from the "good" schools that produce the majority of engineers who are the back bone of the US economy.
The truth is the "top schools" really don't produce any better engineers than the "good" schools. When it comes to actual application of engineering principles, it is the ability to reason, organize and think logically that gets the work done and that is really independent of the school you graduate from.
My definition of a "good" school is most of the state universities that have an accredited engineering school.
If what your looking for is hands on all the way it may be difficult to find an online class but if it just learning A, B, and C in your head it very possible that the degree can be gotten online sorry I can't help out much.
If you have the oil industry in mind for ChE as well. . . I'd go for any major colleges in the part the country where they actually have oil. You have a lot better access to what goes on in the real world that way.
I did my ChE BS in a non-oil area. . . I have a ton of college friends who are working in TX now for the oil companies (not my interest, though), so it's not that you don't learn what you need to know elsewhere. It's just a bit more frustrating if you can't see it, you know?
You do need to be prepared for a good challenge. I can confirm that at least ChE is NOT something you can slack off and still get a degree in — I worked harder with a 12-hour schedule than some other engineering majors did with 14-16+. I never met anyone in my school's petroleum program to ask how it was. . . tiny, tiny major. I'd expect there will always be a demand for both fields, although I'd be inclined to think the long-term (career-length, perhaps) outlook is better for ChE since you're less tied to these fossil fuels we're trying to cut down on using. Both seem to pay really well (#1 and #2 for starting salaries at my undergrad engineering school), although I hope you're not letting that dictate your career choices — you may go insane after 2-3 years if so.
There is a lot of work left to be done and (relatively speaking) there are not that many PE grads every year that are able to do it. Of course the industry is cyclical (I know this since I graduated in 1998 with very low oil prices). I did manage to find a job and it was been a very rewarding career.
Also – you can't beat the starting salaries coming out of school. This year the average is in the $90,000-100,000 range with about a $25,000 signing bonus. Not too shabby.
West Virginia University has an excellent engineering college that is recognized around the world for it's Petroleum and Mining Engineering degrees. When I went to school there (for Aerospace Engineering), it was very common to even have countries from the middle east send students there to learn how to do things right.
It is also a great school, beautiful and a lot of fun to go to.
The oil market will be fine for the next few years, but I would not be surprised if the job market for petroleum and pharmacy starts to get much more competitive.
There is still plenty of oil, but be warned.. petroleum is not exactly a walk in the park. I know a few people at UT Austin in petroleum who absolutely hated it and decided to switch either to business or a different engineering field. If you do not have an interest in the topics studied in petroleum then you will hate it, even if your job years down the line does pay well.
Oil and oil refinement are not going away in our lifetimes, petroleum is necessary for many precursors like plastics and many synthetic chemicals.
If you are still 2-3 years from starting your BS than keep an open mind and do your research. Alternative energy is definitely going to grow as well, so that might be an option too (not sure how that fits in degree-wise, but it is an emergent field)
As for trends in a few decades, obviously no one can say for sure, but petroleum is gonna be involved one way or another ^_^
I believe the petroleum engineering is more based on refinery operations and the oil and gas is a field engineer working on oil and gas production from the ground or ocean
If you disregard University of Texas at Austin and Texas A&M, then the best colleges for Petroleum Engineering are:
Stanford University (CA)
Colorado School of Mines
University of Oklahoma
Louisiana State University–Baton Rouge
University of Tulsa (OK)
Texas Tech University
Penn State University–University Park
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
If you desire to be an engineer, one would think you would have the skills and knowledge to navigate to the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana website on your own.
You could use that degree as a start to then earn a Petroleum Engineering degree from the University of Houston, A&M, University of Texas or Texas Tech. They all offer both BS and MS degrees in Petroleum Engineering. The University of Houston just started their PE program in 2009 whereas the other 3 Texas schools have well established PE programs.
If your grades are good you should have no problem transferring to a 4-year program. You might lose some credit hours due to the differences in curriculum between Petroleum Tech and Petroleum Engineering. However, I have seen some of the Petroleum Tech programs which provided about 80% of similar classes as Petroleum Engineering during the first 2 years.
The easiest way to find out is to contact the University of Houston and discuss this with them as to what will transfer and what will not.
Info on Texas A&M program is available on the website. Also is an email where you can ask this question directly
Leave A Reply